EPSTEIN ADDS DRAMA TO THE ELUSIVE BIOGRAPHY OF PAN YULIANG
IN ART TEXTBOOKS we often read of how Japanese prints
influenced the French Impressionists. Rarely do we hear about cultural movement
in the opposite direction: How did Western painting influence Asia? In fiction, that topic was finally taken up by
Jennifer Cody Epstein’s The Painter from
Shanghai (2008).
Epstein
earned two of her three academic degrees in Asian studies and international
politics. Hence, the novel’s vista on China’s cultural experience in the early
twentieth century could not be in better Western hands.
The novel
recreates the story of the real-life Chinese painter Pan Yuliang, a former indentured
courtesan. During cosmopolitan Shanghai’s roaring twenties, Yuliang rose to be the
“famous Madame Pan,” the scandalously modern, woman painter.
In real
life, Yuliang’s Impressionist-realist works were mostly of women with flowers
and household accoutrements—and mostly as nudes. This Western style of painting was
daring in China. Once on show, the artworks enticed the “wealthy Shanghainese and art-savvy Chinese,” the novel tells
us, but also goaded detractors to label her “a threat to public decency.”
The heart
of the story is Yuliang’s discovery of the Western approach to art—especially
life drawing and painting the nude—amid the country’s conservative Confucian
strictures on art and design. During her life at the brothel, she once mused,
she'd seen the female body in so many contortions that it was impossible for
the female form to shock or offend her. To the contrary, though, Yuliang posed her
figures in modest elegance. Nevertheless, because they “show all,” as her nervous
dealer said, they pushed the envelope in puritanical China.
The novel plays
up these ironies. For example, there is open acceptance of brothels and
concubines in the society. And yet paying women to be nude models at an art
school becomes a public controversy. This draws our heroine’s interest.
She tries at home to draw a body, even her own hand, and then has “a rush of
clarity” about art. “She can
draw them from life. That, of course, is why it’s called ‘life study.’”
She
is taught further by a small circle of pro-Western-style artists in Shanghai
(whom newspapers called “traitors to art”). One teacher says the obvious in the
face of community protest: “Western
artists have been performing life studies for centuries.”
After studying
in Paris, Yuliang
returns to China with a realist style very much akin to the more realist
periods of a Matisse, Bonnard, Picasso, or Modigliani. This was at a time when
art officials tied to government still editorialized that, “Renior is vulgar,
Cezanne is shallow, Matisse is inferior.” Yuliang adds to their chagrin
by specializing in female nudes. This seals her fate, and in 1937 she will
leave China for good.
The works
of the historical Pan Yuliang’s (as in Mrs. Pan) have survived in great number,
totaling perhaps four thousand. Yet she did not keep a diary, preserve letters,
or have her biography detailed before she died in Paris in 1977. As a result,
the novelist’s touch is required to enliven The
Painter from Shanghai, and it was done by Epstein in four ways.
The first
half of the book is essentially about the life of a young Chinese woman sold to
a house of prostitution—“the Hall”—after her parents died. The second half
begins when a kindhearted businessman saves her from that life; he makes her
one of his wives. With time to spare, she “scribbles,” learns about drawing,
and then meets students at a Western-style art academy. She persuades its
teacher to let her in, though she did not pass the entry test. “I’m better,”
she says. That’s why she should get the last opening slot.
Her
latent talent appears, and she wins a scholarship to study at the elite École
des Beaux-Arts in Paris. There, she has a love affair with a young Chinese
exile, Kundu, who is part
of the communist movement. It wants to overthrow the old imperial system, and
is competing with the Nationalists for who will dictate the new Chinese social
order.
Her lover
Kundu, it turns out, is a right hand man to Zhou Enlai, the future premier of
Communist China. Yuliang's tangential ties to this revolutionary circle, the “CCP
cadre,” goes public back in China. As a result, her old-fashioned
husband—who has energetically supported her painting career—will lose his job
as the Communist-Nationalist rivalry intensifies.
A dramatic
crescendo comes in 1929 in Shanghi, which Yuliang calls the “Paris of the East.”
She is having a major exhibition. Rightwing thugs who support the Nationalists demolish
the exhibit after they steal the paintings. “All gone,” Yuliang says,
nearly broken. “Half a lifetime of work.”
The vandals
leave only one painting, that of a male figure. She stomps it to pieces and says to
the newspaper cameras, “There. . . . I always finish the job.” It’s kind of her
motto through the story.
Yuliang is
a tenacious, but beaten for the moment. She quits painting. She conforms by
being a university teacher. In the end, though, she cannot bear to censure her
creativity. On a final night, she embraces her devoted older husband, yearns to
bear his child, but all to no avail. In his embrace, “She is already miles
away.” She says to herself conclusively, “I didn’t chose to be this way. . . .
I’ve tried to change. I simply can’t.”
She buys a
one-way ticket to Marseilles, France, where a gallery wants to exhibit her
work. Her husband believes China will get better. He thinks she is off on a holiday.
She know it’s her final exile.
As a novel,
The Painter from Shanghai
reveals some of the ironic twists that modern art trends have taken, East and
West.
One is seen in the contrast Epstein draws between the opening of Yuliang’s story
and the account of the 1929 “disastrous exhibition,” which is a highpoint at
the end of the novel. During that
exhibit, which nearly ended her career, Yuliang’s paintings were at the cutting
edge of controversy. However, in the first pages of the novel, we meet Yuliang
at her Paris studio in 1957. She is still painting nude models. But it’s a time
in Europe when “People don’t want girls with flowers right now. They want
splashes and gashes.” In other words, abstract art has shunted aside the kind
of figurative painting to which Yuliang has wedded herself.
Another twist
is this: After she leaves China, the Communist Party enforces “socialist realism” as
the only acceptable form of painting. The party rejects the same imperial aesthetic that
Yuliang and her teachers opposed, but now it has adopted Western realism for totalitarian purposes.
Still,
Yuliang feels triumphant, and still very Chinese, we can suppose. In the
nonfiction world, she kept her Chinese citizenship and was buried in Chinese robes
in Montmartre, the Paris hub of the artistic avant-garde during her own
youthful heyday.
No comments:
Post a Comment