PATRICK WHITE ENDS LITERARY CAREER WITH FICTION ABOUT A PAINTER
THERE IS NO NOBEL Prize for painting. So the closest brush
with this greatness has been the 1973 Nobel Prize in Literature. It was given
to Australian author Patrick White, who’s last and longest novel is about a painter.
White, a
kind of Faulkner of Australia, won the prize for producing an “epic and psychological narrative art which
has introduced a new continent into literature.” That string of novels ends in The Vivisector (1970), the story of Australian
modernist painter Hurttle Duffield.
Duffield is not the kind of
Dickensian character everyone knows about. But Down Under, and in literary
circles, he evokes a favorite image of the modern artist: tortured—and
torturing—having lived in a century of Depression, war, personal debauchery, and
the art market. The renowned Australian artist Sydney Nolan—perhaps one model
for White’s mosaic story—stood in for the ailing Mr. White at the Noble Prize
awards, reading White’s brief comments.
Understanding The Vivisector, however, may be aided by knowing that White was
also an acquaintance of the British artist Francis Bacon. As a painter of
humanoid horror, Bacon was no wallflower himself: randy, fast-living, and as he
said, saddled with “a weakness for alcohol and young boys.”
In any case, Duffield could be
anyone between Nolan and Bacon, and others included.
The title, Vivisector, sets the macabre tone. Duffield grows up in Depression-era
Australia, where cattle and slaughter underwrite the economy. In “a dirty
deal,” his impoverished parents sell him to a wealthy family that wants a brother for their hunchbacked
daughter. His new mother, avid for an animal humane society, is galvanized
further on a family trip to London. They see a simulated vivisected dog—meaning
the dog is cut open, revealing its green and purplish innards, for scientific
research. “The dog’s exposed teeth were gnashing in a permanent and most
realistic agony.” Sounds like a Bacon painting.
After this, Duffield conceives of “God
the Vivisector,” thinking that such a being gave man both cruelty and brilliance.
Duffield doesn’t believe in supreme beings, but he wants to think big about a
cruel world that is dotted with occasional brilliance, perhaps, in the work of an
artist. His own lifelong struggle is to capture Light itself—one painting is
called Marriage of Light—in a single,
end-all, transcendent painting.
Just the opposite, though, Duffield’s
sees mostly darkness. His
Latin tutor kills himself; young Hurttle “paints it on the wall.” He goes to
the war front. On return he lives with a Sydney prostitute, Nance. For his home
and studio he builds a “shack on the edge of the gorge.” After a night of drunken argument, Nance
falls down the cliff. Accident, suicide, murder?
By now, Duffield has a postwar art
dealer, Caldicott, a homosexual attracted to the younger artist. His dealer dies
after a “long illness.” Duffield’s torturous paintings—rocks, animal forms,
scenes with blood—first sell to a few rich ladies in Sydney. Then they’re
scooped up in London and New York (and eventually the Tate and Museum of Modern
Art).
A childhood girlfriend named Boo appears.
Now she is Mrs. Davenport (or Mrs. Lopez), a wealthy art collector. She
introduces Duffield to an even wealthier Greek shipping couple, and the missus—Hero
Pavloussi—seduces Duffield amidst
his frightening artworks. She takes him to a Greek island in pursuit of a
monastic wise man (who is not there).
Later, Hero attempts suicide and finally
dies of cancer. Back in Australia, Duffield becomes enamored of a young girl,
Kathy Volkov, who is going on to her own fame as a concert pianist. Hurttle has
seduced the girl, but world ambition calls, and she leaves him behind. On her
European tour, she writes to thank him for teaching her—with his “delicious
kisses and all the other lovely play”—about how to be an artist.
The great Retrospective of Duffield
is now at hand. Except that Hurttle has a stroke. He is crippled in body and
mind. His plan to complete a series of “God paintings”—fulfilling his early
notations about “God the Vivisector”—may be delayed. In the end, he is still
searching for the ultimate Light painting. His mind—in the last chapters—is
filled with a confusion of words (that is, the text is like impressionistic
poetry, not making any sense except in the haunting, hopeless mood White tries
to create).
Some commentators have said The Vivisector is about such ideals as truth,
love, and the struggling artist. Maybe so. Everyone is a candidate for
struggle, although the artist-as-struggler is a convenient literary motif. The
truth-love dichotomy is more interesting. Duffield says that although his
paintings “deliver truth,” he’s “failed so far in love.” The truth of
his ghastly paintings, in other words, gets in the way of normal relationships. Paintings aren’t always
vehicles of truth, of course. They can simply be an artist’s confusion, unhappiness,
and psychosis in paint.
With Patrick White the novelist, we’re talking
about great and prolific literary fiction. He knows that fiction works best
when it pushes the human dilemma to extremes. Such is the character of Hurttle
Duffield, a vivisector of the human condition. Most painters don’t have to endure such a tortured life. Instead, they can read about it in a 617-page novel, and that is just
fine.
No comments:
Post a Comment