Novels in Which Not Everyone Likes Art
MOST PEOPLE ENJOY a good painting. Yet art appreciation is not as simple as it sounds. An artwork might evoke just a passing glance. At other times, it might seem absurd, entirely irrelevant to people outside that art-world bubble.
A good many
novelists have noticed this fact. They have used the awkward side of art
appreciation to add charm to a story. It’s also a great way to poke fun at the
extremes of seeing in works of art more than is really there, objectively
speaking.
Take David
Lipsky’s coming-of-age novel, The Art
Fair (1996). Single mom Joan Freeley is ambitiously climbing up in the New
York art scene. She makes large, abstract, color stain paintings. It’s a style modeled
after her idol and rival, cutting-edge painter Celia. Now mom’s career is
crumbling, but she still takes her teenage son Richard—the narrator of the
story—to yet another gallery “opening” featuring Celia.
As Richard
glances at the paintings, he doesn’t get what all the art aficionados see in
them after intense periods of looking.
Says his
mom, “Try to really look.”
“I am looking,” Richard retorts.
What he
mainly notices is that the titles have nothing to do with the paintings, and
prices range from $16,000 to $20,000. This is the first art gallery “opening” party
Richard goes to with his mom. For the rest of the novel he bolsters her sliding
morale—as a has-been artist—from one opening party to another.
This
contrast between people who “do get” and “don’t get” art appears in three other
interesting novels.
In Jeff
Vande Zande’s Landscape with Fragmented
Figures (2009), brothers Ray and Sammy Casper are forced to live with each
other in working class upper Michigan after their father died. Sammy is an
unemployed plant worker and heavy drinker; Ray a painter and art professor on a
downward slope. His artist girlfriend left him because he lost “vision” in his
art. In other words, Ray had regressed into painting nice pictures to sell to
corporation lobbies, while she was radical, displaying as art the spattered drop
cloths of the house-painter proletariat.
Brother Sammy
can’t understand the big deal about Ray’s late unhappiness over art. “What’s
your big beef?” he asks.
Ray: “I
can’t explain it, really. It’s just with my art.”
Sammy notes
that Ray knows how to paint stuff pretty good. Ray says that’s not enough. He
grabs a picture of Renoir’s Luncheon at
the Boating Party and says to Sammy: “This is art. This has vision.”
Sammy
studied the painting. He got two more beers, lit a cigarette and says, “It
looks like a bunch of a--holes having lunch. . . . I mean, it’s good. I sure as
hell couldn’t do it.” Ray tries to make Sammy see how Renoir reveals human
relations. Sammy says, “I don’t know. I guess.”
Their
conversation descends into an argument about who has real problems in life. It
sure doesn’t seem to Sammy that a painter losing artistic vision is much compared to
losing jobs, spouses, and a place to live. “Most people I know have real
problems,” Sammy says. “Sounds to me like you’re just dreaming s--t up to worry
about.”
Art
appreciation also comes hard to the husband narrator of David Nicholls’s witty novel,
US, which tells the story of the
Petersen family of London. They are taking a Grand Tour of Europe’s art museums
before the son goes off to college. The wife has just told her boring husband
Douglas, a biochemist, that she is leaving him. As former art student and
painter, she yearns for the creative, fancy-free days of her youth. First,
though, the tottering family will take the trip—and see if it might change
things.
At the
Louvre, Douglas explains why he doesn’t get art the way his wife does: “My art
appreciation is almost on par with my French,” he says. “Despite all my best
efforts my responses seem to me fundamentally shallow.”
In
portraiture he likes people he can recognize: “Look, it’s Uncle Tony.” In realist
works he looks for detail: “Look at the eyelashes!” And in abstract art he goes
for his favorite colors: “‘I love the blue’—as if the works of Rothko and
Mondrian were little more than immense paint charts.” Indeed, his concept of
beauty is shaped by the microbes he studies in the laboratory.
On reaching
one painting by the Italian Renaissance humorist Giuseppe Arcimboldo, Douglas declares
to his son, “Look, Albie, his face is made up of fruits and vegetables.” For
this insult to Albie’s intelligence, the father believes he deserves “the award
for Most Banal Remark Ever Made in an Art Gallery.” Going to an art museum is
tiring, he finds out. It’s partly because of “the mental exertion of wondering
what to say.”
The police
in crime novels also face their share of difficult art appreciation. They look at
paintings to ferret out clues or evidence. A great scene like this crops up in
Peter Heller’s artist-noir-Southwest novel, The
Painter (2015). Jim Stegner is a Postimpressionist painter living in a
cabin studio in rural Colorado. For a second time, he’s in trouble with the law.
Now he’s killed a man with a rock. Two deputies arrive and notice a big
painting he’s been working on.
“Can I take
a look at it?” asks the older deputy. His smile becomes a “big grin” at the
title: Ocean of Women. A good many
females and one male swim in the nebulous, watery scene on the canvas.
The young
deputy is adjusting to the culture shock, according to Stegner’s first person narration:
“The kid stood uneasily before the easel, his hand on his holstered gun,
blinking. I could tell he wanted to laugh, maybe the first time he’d seen an
original painting ever, one that wasn’t painted by an aunt that had taken a How
to Paint a Western Landscape by Numbers class and hung it in the den next to
the flat screen, . . .” Still, the kid deputy “glanced at his mentor and
relaxed, twitched a smile, studied the painting, dove into it, couldn’t help
himself, his eyes roved from woman to woman wondering maybe how many the
swimmer could f— and still tread water.”
Then the
senior cop picks up another painting, “Wow,” he says. “Diverse. When’d you
paint this?” It's the picture of a hunched man digging a grave. Stegner
painted it the day of murder, and he says, “Maybe it’s time I get a lawyer.”
No comments:
Post a Comment